Skip to main content

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Economic Growth - Chapter 4b

Definition

Economic growth is driven primarily by improvements in productivity, essentially the ability to produce more goods and services with the same inputs of labour, capital, energy, and materials aided by technology advancements.

Short-run vs. Long-run

Economists distinguish between short-term economic stabilization (the business cycle) and long-term economic growth.  The long-run path of economic growth is one of the central questions in economics since increases in GDP are generally equated to increases in standards of living.  Small differences in growth rates can result in big differences when compounded over years.  For example, an 8% growth rate leads to a doubling of GDP within just 10 years.   Differences in growth rates between countries can similarly lead to wide gaps developing in relative standards of living.  As such, the pursuit of economic growth has become a major focus of governments globally, particularly since World War II.

Drivers

But what drives economic growth?  In the UK, since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, long-term growth has averaged roughly 2% per annum.  It is argued that a major factor spurring economic growth since that time has been the substitution of energy for human and animal labour and water and wind power - with this great expansion in total power underpinned by continuous improvements in energy conversion efficiency.  In short, economic growth centres on material throughput.

Over the last two centuries, a succession of civil and technological breakthroughs has been facilitated by the availability of cheap energy.  These include the canals, railways and roads; new materials such as steel; the use of steam and the development of the Internal Combustion Engine; mechanized agriculture; and scientific agriculture including chemical fertilizers and the Green Revolution.  Interchangeable parts, made with machine tools, have powered electric motors and resulted in universal mass production.

In the 20th Century, further advances were made after the Great Depression, which was caused, in part, by over-production in the 1920s and a speculative bubble based on the back of that leading to the 1929 Wall Street Crash.  Later on, new goods and services were invented and developed throughout the century and included telephones, radio, television, cars, household appliances, air conditioning, commercial airlines, computers, and the internet.  In the post-war period, the economy benefited from cheap energy in the form of vast oil discoveries, particularly in the Middle East.

Global View

Since the 1970s, growth has slowed in the West but has been strong in the East, firstly in Japan, then spreading to Korea, China, India, and other Asian countries.  Japan has since slowed, but growth remains strong - particularly in China and, recently, India.  This state of affairs has much to do with global trade and unfair trade practices skewed against the US, even as the US helped form the trade rules-based agenda.  At the time of writing (April 2025), this may be changing.  A bigger factor, however, has been the availability of cheap energy, combined with technology advances spurring growth in economies around the world.

Different Theories

To understand economic growth, four theories may be considered:

- Classical Growth Theory:  This considers Labour (L) and Capital (K) as primary sources of economic growth and holds technology as a constant.  This is now widely criticised as it is now evident that technology plays a role in economic growth in modern economies, as do economies of scale.

- Neoclassical Growth Theory: This theory, which was common in the 1950s, assumes that technology plays a role in the formulation of economic growth.  Eventually, all countries will have the same rate of economic growth, which is determined by the pace of technological change, and poor countries can become rich by investing a greater share of their GDP.  This is globalisation, pure and simple.  This model is known as an 'exogenous' model because it does not explain why countries invest differently over time or why technology progresses.  Also, a criticism is that investment flows to poor countries - which have less capital per worker - have not happened on the whole.

- Endogenous Growth Theory: This became popular in the late 1980s and early 1990s and sought a greater technology inclusion in economic growth theory.  For the first time, it included the concept of human capital, which has increasing returns rather than diminishing returns (as with L and K).  Subsequently, research has focused on improving growth rates through education and innovation.

- Unified Growth Theory: This is the latest economic theory, which builds on the Endogenous Growth Theory but seeks to explain the bridge between pre-industrial stagnation and post-industrial steady economic growth with technology playing an important role.

Although there are different theories, the current paradigm in that comparative advantage, free trade, capital accumulation, education, and technological change are key, together with cheap energy.  Individual countries should each always act in their national self-interest, however, and there may well be a role for some tariffs to protect industry, particularly in key strategic areas (think steel for tanks).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Chapter 3b - Life!

Live life abundantly!  (John 10:10). What To Do About Climate Change? The fundamental problem is that carbon emissions are so inexorably linked to economic activity (IT, housing, agriculture, manufacturing, and transport) that reducing them and operating a 'green' economy is no small task.  Thinking negatively, economy derailment could be the solution - although to be positive the focus should be a major change along the continuum of slowing, stabilizing, and reducing CO2 emissions within a fully functioning economy, which runs counter to many environmentalists' thinking.  However, we definitely need a new economy based on a clean-energy future. We are, truly, in a Climate Emergency.  As outlined throughout, unless bold action is taken to change the economic system while carbon budgets allow, we may well be facing a long drawn-out equivalent of the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs 66 million years ago - and certainly the worst set of circumstances since The Flood i...

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Chapter 2b

Climate Sensitivity Quantifying temperature increase in relation to CO2 volume depends on 'climate sensitivity'.  Commonly, this refers to temperature increase resulting from CO2 doubling since the pre-industrial times atmospheric baseline of 280ppm to approx. 550ppm.  The IPCC models predict a range of 2C to 4.5C above 1900, with a best estimate of 3C.  As of June 2024, the world is currently at 427ppm and 1.55C above 1900. Although both temperature and atmosphere water vapor will continue to increase, specific impacts will depend on geographical location.  For example, higher latitudes together with mid-continental locations are expected to warm sooner and faster.  Also, high rainfall areas should get wetter contrasting drier drought-prone regions.  Much modeling is in progress to predict these regional impacts in greater detail, although we mustn't also forget that it is ultimately God who sends the rains.  The challenge of climate change, particula...

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Chapter 3a

Dangerous Climate Change Based on the best available scientific evidence, it is clear that increases in CO2, and other greenhouse gases in CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent), which constitute F in the Kaya Identity (see earlier), result in temperature elevation.  The relationship between the two is known as climate sensitivity.  It is accepted by most scientists that a CO2 doubling (from pre-industrial 280ppm to 550ppm) will probably lead to a roughly 3C temperature rise.  The IPCC calculated a range of 1.5C and 4.5C depending on the emission scenario.  Unfortunately, this is far from exact since fossil records estimate that climate sensitivity could be as high as 6C (Hansen). Are temperature increases dangerous? The overriding consensus is a resounding yes.  There is no question that biomes, including pathogenic species, would survive and even proliferate.  The concern is that widespread ecosystem collapse would occur specifically concerning biomes on which ...