Skip to main content

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Chapter 10 - Conclusion

We are, truly, in a Climate Emergency. As outlined throughout this book, unless bold action is taken to change the economic system, we may face a long-drawn-out equivalent of the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs 66 million years ago - and certainly the worst set of circumstances since The Flood in Noah's Time.  There are real problems ahead: fire, flooding, and loss of entire cities; drought; hundreds of millions of migrants; ocean acidification; increased disease; significant food shortages; and, probably, WW3.

However, one thing that Christians can be certain of is the imminent Return of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to sort all these problems out.  We need to be ready at all times for His Return, but I can confidently predict that He will Return no later than the Feast of Trumpets in 2028.  That gives us 3 1/2 years from now to get our environmental house in order and at least a blueprint for a better world.

But the IPCC 2018 Report makes it clear that the world must target a temperature increase above that of 1900 to no more than 2C - and even better, 1.5C.  If we fail, the future looks very bleak indeed.

To achieve this, the bold action required is needed now and, as the Drawdown Report emphasises, this must be done on multiple fronts.  As an economist and capitalist, I cannot foresee how the world will forgo economic growth, and so, by way of a compromise, a 2- 2.5% pa increase in world GDP is factored into the Kaya Equations I presented in Chapter 5.  What matters pivotally, of course, is what kind of growth we are talking about, and here too, the Drawdown Report is full of ideas.  Critically, though, we must:

- End Coal Production

- End Deforestation and begin Reforestation

- Accelerate the transition to EVs and the accompanying clean-up of the energy generation base away from fossil fuels and towards renewables and nuclear energy

- Switch from Natural Gas to Hydrogen

- Reduce beef consumption

The Trade-Off

There remains, however, a direct trade-off between increased technology (including efficiency gains) and population.  I am not advocating a general reduction in population size (other than by natural disasters and viruses), but clearly population growth must be addressed.  As the Drawdown Report emphasises, family planning and educating girls will go a long way to achieving this.  Better managed population sizes will actually bring many benefits to the health of a country's economy and its citizens.  Equally, the solution to global warming is not just about controlling population.  After all, Genesis states very clearly that Man was to "Go forth and multiply".  Technology will play a major role, as will land management practices.  And behavioural change is key - being climate-friendly should stop being a burden.

There is a need to seek Western-led global solutions, and in a time frame that will reduce carbon emissions early.  If we don't take the lead, China will.  But if so, why work to an arbitrary deadline of 2050?  If the case has been made that the sooner action is taken, the better, why not aim for 2028?  Could this be achieved? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Chapter 3b - Life!

Live life abundantly!  (John 10:10). What To Do About Climate Change? The fundamental problem is that carbon emissions are so inexorably linked to economic activity (IT, housing, agriculture, manufacturing, and transport) that reducing them and operating a 'green' economy is no small task.  Thinking negatively, economy derailment could be the solution - although to be positive the focus should be a major change along the continuum of slowing, stabilizing, and reducing CO2 emissions within a fully functioning economy, which runs counter to many environmentalists' thinking.  However, we definitely need a new economy based on a clean-energy future. We are, truly, in a Climate Emergency.  As outlined throughout, unless bold action is taken to change the economic system while carbon budgets allow, we may well be facing a long drawn-out equivalent of the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs 66 million years ago - and certainly the worst set of circumstances since The Flood i...

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Chapter 2b

Climate Sensitivity Quantifying temperature increase in relation to CO2 volume depends on 'climate sensitivity'.  Commonly, this refers to temperature increase resulting from CO2 doubling since the pre-industrial times atmospheric baseline of 280ppm to approx. 550ppm.  The IPCC models predict a range of 2C to 4.5C above 1900, with a best estimate of 3C.  As of June 2024, the world is currently at 427ppm and 1.55C above 1900. Although both temperature and atmosphere water vapor will continue to increase, specific impacts will depend on geographical location.  For example, higher latitudes together with mid-continental locations are expected to warm sooner and faster.  Also, high rainfall areas should get wetter contrasting drier drought-prone regions.  Much modeling is in progress to predict these regional impacts in greater detail, although we mustn't also forget that it is ultimately God who sends the rains.  The challenge of climate change, particula...

Beyond Blue Sky 2025 - Chapter 3a

Dangerous Climate Change Based on the best available scientific evidence, it is clear that increases in CO2, and other greenhouse gases in CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent), which constitute F in the Kaya Identity (see earlier), result in temperature elevation.  The relationship between the two is known as climate sensitivity.  It is accepted by most scientists that a CO2 doubling (from pre-industrial 280ppm to 550ppm) will probably lead to a roughly 3C temperature rise.  The IPCC calculated a range of 1.5C and 4.5C depending on the emission scenario.  Unfortunately, this is far from exact since fossil records estimate that climate sensitivity could be as high as 6C (Hansen). Are temperature increases dangerous? The overriding consensus is a resounding yes.  There is no question that biomes, including pathogenic species, would survive and even proliferate.  The concern is that widespread ecosystem collapse would occur specifically concerning biomes on which ...